EN

イベント

カテゴリ
日時
タイトル
報告者/場所
詳細
2025/06/19 (木)
17:00〜18:30
LQG Information Design
Masaki Miyashita (The University of Hong Kong)
本館1階会議室
2025/06/12 (木)
17:00〜18:30
Takashi Kunimoto (Singapore Management University)
本館1階会議室
2025/06/05 (木)
17:00〜18:30
The 14th Conference on Economic Design 報告練習会
Yuya Wakabayashi (Kyoto university)
Masahiro Kawasaki (Kyoto university)
Rui He (Kyoto university)
本館1階会議室

“Strategy-proof rules in object allocation problems with hard budget constraints and income effects”
Yuya Wakabayashi (Kyoto university)
“Sequential dictatorship rules in multi-unit object assignment problems with money”
Masahiro Kawasaki (Kyoto university)
“Dynamic Many-to-One Matching under Constraints”
Rui He (Kyoto university)

2025/06/05 (木)
13:15〜14:45
Computational Economics and AI【マクロ経済学セミナーと共催】
John Stachurski(Australian National University)
経済研究所 北館1階 N101/102講義室
2025/06/04 (水)
16:45〜18:15
Yusuke Narita (Yale University)
第一共同研究室(4F 北側)
2025/05/30 (金)
11:00〜12:30
[応用ミクロ経済学セミナーと共催]
Stochastic Compliance and Identification of LATE (with Hidehiko Ichimura)
Juan Pantano (University of Hong Kong)
本館1階 106 会議室

Abstract: The exclusion restriction plays a key role in the identification of LATE (Imbens & Angrist (1994), Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)). We discuss a particularly ubiquitous way in which the exclusion restriction would seem to be generically violated. We argue that this form of violation is not addressed in the many applications that rely on this influential framework. We characterize the bias that this particular violation gives rise to and, more constructively, discuss how to use the particular structure of the violation along with milder assumptions and additional data to restore identification. We provide sharper bounds by exploiting the specific structure of the exclusion restriction violation we uncover. Further, with an additional assumption which is plausible in many empirical settings, we restore point identification of LATE. We illustrate with examples and discuss why this violation is likely present in most existing empirical applications. We discuss how our arguments naturally extend to other IV settings where the LATE parameter is commonly invoked, such as randomized controlled trials with imperfect compliance and fuzzy regression discontinuity designs. Moving beyond LATE, we also consider how the same problems and solution ideas apply to identification of the MTE profile and more structural “Roy” models of treatment effects.

2025/05/29 (木)
17:00〜18:30
Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Human Artists
Patrick DeJarnette (Waseda University)
本館1階会議室
2025/05/29 (木)
16:00〜17:30
Viktoria Hnatkovska(University of British Columbia)
京都大学法経済学部東館 8階 リフレッシュルーム

Abstract: Over the past three decades China and India have experienced rapid growth and structural transformation. Underneath this similarity however is one significant difference: rural-urban wage gaps during this period declined in India, but widened in China. We formalize a two-sector-two-location model in which structural transformation and urbanization respond endogenously to productivity shocks. While the structural transformation effect widens the rural-urban wage gap, the urbanization effect reduces it. We attribute the contrasting wage gap dynamics in the two countries to the higher costs of urban relocation for workers in China.

2025/05/28 (水)
16:45〜18:15
Causal inference with auxiliary observations
太田 悠太(慶應義塾大学)
第一共同研究室(4F 北側)

要旨: In the evaluation of social programs, it is often difficult to conduct randomized controlled experiments due to non-compliance; therefore the local average treatment effect (LATE) is commonly applied. However, the LATE identifies the average treatment effect only for a subpopulation known as compliers and requires the monotonicity assumption. Given these limitations of the LATE, this paper proposes a nonparametric strategy to identify the causal effects for larger populations (such as the ATT and ATE) and to remove the monotonicity assumption in the cases of non-compliance. Our strategy utilizes two types of auxiliary observations, one is an outcome before assignment and the other is a treatment before assignment. These observations do not require specially designed experiments, and are likely to be observed in baseline surveys of the standard experiment or panel data. We show the results for the random assignment and those of multiply robust representations in the case where the random assignment is violated. We then present details of the GMM estimation and testing methods which utilize over-identified restrictions. The proposed strategy is illustrated by empirical examples which revisit the studies by Thornton (2008), Gerber et al. (2009), and Beam (2016), as well as the data set from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment and that from an experimental data on marketing in a private sector.

2025/05/22 (木)
17:00〜18:30
Eric Weese (University of Tokyo)
本館1階会議室
TOP